Our team meeting centered around reviewing a preliminary outline of our problem formulation. I presented our initial problem definition, objectives, criteria, constraints, and requirements, aiming to establish a solid foundation. During this discussion, Arash proposed an insightful addition to our problem domain, suggesting the inclusion of addressing discomfort in physiotherapy or reducing its associated costs. This sparked a conversation on the type of rehabilitation challenge we wished to undertake.
Tommy found several studies concerning cerebral palsy and its rehabilitation process, indicating potential benefits in providing tactile feedback through VR. Arash uncovered research addressing the global obesity pandemic, exploring the utilization of VR to aid individuals combating obesity. Ben introduced the idea of aiding individuals with disabilities like autism through exercise using VR technology. These various potential challenges prompted us to consider refining our survey to gather more diverse responses and conduct additional research. Ben suggested seeking input from a physiotherapist to gain insights from experts in the rehabilitation field.
Furthermore, we deliberated on potential grant options, considering opportunities such as the Velocity Pitch, Sustainability Pitch, or Health Scholarship. Ben agreed to delve deeper into researching these grant possibilities.
Regarding project requirements, we reached a consensus that the solution's battery should be swappable due to our reliance on a power bank (as a requirement for battery life). Additionally, we contemplated sourcing components, debating between Mouser, McMaster Carr, or Amazon. We plan to consult Paul Groh about potential parts procurement, exploring options like flex sensors or spring-loaded potentiometers.
Finally, as part of our action plan, Tanish, Tommy, and I were assigned the task of conducting further research using platforms like SciHub, Lens.org, or Google Scholar to explore VR applications in rehabilitation.
Comments